Minimal Revision of Logical Specification Using Extended Logic Programming: Preliminary Report

نویسنده

  • Ken Satoh
چکیده

This paper presents a method of computing minimal revision of logical specification to handle inconsistencies. We have already proposed a formalization of minimal revision of logical specification (Satoh 1998) which is a modification of minimal revision in (Satoh 1988) and related the formalism with Formula Circumscription (McCarthy 1986). Moreover, we have proposed a computational method for a minimal revised logical specification without function symbols by abductive logic programming. However, the proposed computational method in (Satoh 1998) needs a minimality check of abducibles corresponding with revision in order to get a minimal revised specification. In this paper, we have proposed a method which directly computes a minimal revised specification. The technique is an adaptation of computational method of circumscription (Wakaki and Satoh 1997).

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Type safety for substructural specifications: preliminary results

Substructural logics, such as linear logic and ordered logic, have an inherent notion of state and state change. This makes them a natural choice for developing logical frameworks that specify evolving stateful systems. Our previous work has shown that the so-called forward reasoning fragment of ordered linear logic can be used to give clear, concise, and modular specifications of stateful and ...

متن کامل

A Preliminary Reification of Argument Theory Change

In this article we introduce the basics for understanding the mechanisms of Argument Theory Change. In particular we reify it using Defeasible Logic Programming. In this formalism, knowledge bases are represented through defeasible logic programs. The main change operation we define over a defeasible logic program is a special kind of revision that inserts a new argument and then modifies the r...

متن کامل

Hierarchical Defaults in Specifications

The goal of this paper is to explain the usage and semantics of hierarchical defaults in logical specifications. We discuss the usefulness of defaults for different specification scenarios like specialization, aggregation, explanation, revision, etc. To understand defaults formally, we introduce a general framework parameterized on the underlying logical institution extended by an instantiation...

متن کامل

Substructural Logical Specifications

A logical framework and its implementation should serve as a flexible tool for specifying, simulating, and reasoning about formal systems. When the formal systems we are interested in exhibit state and concurrency, however, existing logical frameworks fall short of this goal. Logical frameworks based on a rewriting interpretation of substructural logics, ordered and linear logic in particular, ...

متن کامل

The Logical Meeting Point of Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebra: Progress Report

We present a revisited semantics for multiset rewriting founded on the left sequent rules of linear logic in its LV presentation. The resulting interpretation is extended with a majority of linear connectives into the language of ωmultisets. It drops the distinction between multiset elements and rewrite rules, and considerably enriches the expressive power of standard multiset rewriting with em...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003